1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts: (a) Plaintiff A was trying to put tin, etc., up to June 17, 2015, into loading and moving a passenger car, and tin, etc. was shocked on the front side of the passenger car; (b) due to its shock, the upper upper part of the tin, etc. was separated from the upper part of the tin, and the new tin was shocked by the lower part of the Plaintiff A’s growth.

Plaintiff

A, who wished to the “D Council member” operated by the Defendant, received mematic surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”) on June 17, 2015 on the 4 frameworks of the stroke, and was hospitalized according to the Defendant’s direction.

Afterwards, Plaintiff A caused rings to “a dubsium 2,3 dubsium 2,” and eventually received cutting. At present, Plaintiff A was cut to “a dubsium 2,3 dubsium 2, and dubsium dubsium 2,3 dubsium.”

Plaintiff

B is the child of the plaintiff A.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 9 and Eul evidence Nos. 3, 4, and 5, and the result of the physical examination entrusted to the E Hospital Head of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' assertion (i.e., the defendant asserts that the defendant neglected the duty to maintain the operation room and the operation apparatus in a feasible condition so as not to be infected by the operation in the process of collecting the operation, and neglected the operation in an unreasonable manner despite the absence of the ability to perform the operation or medical equipment, and neglected the duty to observe the progress after the operation and take appropriate measures. Furthermore, the plaintiff Gap's external access excessively controls the plaintiff A's external access excessively, and due to medical negligence of refusing to transfer the operation to another hospital, the plaintiff Gap suffered damages, such as the suspension of satisfaction due to the infection of the operation department and the collapse of the outbreak.

In addition, although the defendant does not explain the side effects of infection after surgery, or can receive treatment at a hospital equipped with medical equipment such as pressure equipment, it can be simply treated at the hospital operated by the defendant.