logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2013.07.11 2012고단218
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 5, 2010, at the victim T’s house located in Sinnam-gun S, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement stating that the Defendant belongs to “U”; (b) “I will lend money with monthly rent, if I want to repair and start a house; and (c) I would like to pay money to the Defendant.”

However, the Defendant did not own a studio 2 in the above Nam-Eup, without a certain source of revenue, raised three children without a credit card, and was using a friendly parent’s credit card because it was impossible to make a credit card due to bad credit standing, and the Defendant was not “U” but “U” created by the Defendant.

Nevertheless, as above, the Defendant, as described in the attached Table 1, received a total of KRW 16 million from August 5, 2010 to May 16, 201, including the fact that the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and received KRW 3 million from the victim on the same day as the same day from the victim, and acquired it by deception, as shown in the attached Table 1.

2. On August 5, 2010, the Defendant: (a) borrowed 3 million won from T at the above T’s office from T to 3 million won; (b) forged one copy of the loan certificate, which is a private document with the intention of using “V” in the column of the borrower’s address as “V”, “H” in the column of the borrower’s name and address; and (c) in the column of the borrower’s resident registration number, “V”, without authority, with the intention of using the loan certificate as “V.”

In addition, from August 5, 2010 to September 10, 2010, the Defendant forged a private document loan certificate, which is a private document with no authority, for the purpose of exercising over a total of six occasions, as shown in attached Table 2, from around August 5, 2010 to around September 10.

3. On August 5, 2010, the Defendant’s uttering of the above investigation document does not know of the forgery of the loan certificate under paragraph 2 from the above T’s house.

arrow