beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal records] On December 22, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor from the Suwon District Court in the form of fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 30, 2016.
[2] The Defendant was delegated with the duties of the monthly rent rental agreement and the receipt of rent from around March 2015, as a certified intermediary operating the “T Authorized Broker” in Pyeongtaek-si, the Defendant, from around March 2015, to the head of Pyeongtaek-si, U.S. (hereinafter “the head of the instant studio”).
1. On May 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) delegated only the authority to conclude a monthly rent contract by the head of the studio-type building in the instant Telecommunication offices; (b) but without authority to execute the rent lease contract in the name of the lessee W and X, the Defendant of the document forgery and the instant Telecommunication event is transferred to the lessee by May 20, 2015 without authority for the purpose of exercising the right to execute the rent lease contract in the name of the lessee W and X; (c) “30 million won in the deposit column”; (d) “30 million won in the down payment column”; and (e) in the term column, the lessor may use the said real estate for the purpose of the lease; and (e) the lease period from the delivery date to May 20, 2016 to the lessee by December 20, 2016.
“Y” and the lessor’s resident registration number column indicated in the “U” column and the lessor’s name column indicated in the “U” was stamped with the U’s seal prepared in advance next to the name of the “U” and then delivered to the said W.
Accordingly, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged one copy of the studio charter contract in U’s name, which is a private document concerning rights and obligations without authority, and delivered a forged pre-paid charter contract to W who is aware of the fact as if it was actually formed, and forged the contract as shown in the attached list of crimes from June 9, 2015, and exercised it by delivering the forged contract to the next buyer.
2. On May 20, 2015, the Defendant is owned by WW (the nominal X) and U, as described in paragraph 1, at the above Tangible Brokerage Office.