Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Public offering] The Defendant, along with C (Detention on June 26, 2015), D, E (Detention Prosecution on March 14, 2016), F (Non-Detention Prosecution on June 26, 2015), will provide call center offices to unspecified victims with loans to the call center offices, etc. at the trade name in the cock ton of Thailand, and the office, etc.
In the course of committing the crime of “Sishing” by receiving money from the victims to another person’s passbook (hereinafter referred to as the “Stopbook”), the Defendant: (a) provided telephone counseling with the unspecified number of victims; (b) provided to the public offering of a passbook; (c) provided telephone counseling with the unspecified number of victims; (d) provided to the public offering of a passbook; (d) provided data collection with personal information stored; and (d) provided to F, a domestic cash withdrawal book; and (c) provided to F, under the direction of C, provided that the Defendant and C, etc., such as the Defendant and C, who received the Stopbook from the sale book of the S to withdraw the money and then deliver it to C by withdrawing the money wired from the money wired to the above Stopbook; and (b) provided that the Defendant and the members of Bosping “Stoping”, who wished to collect money in order by borrowing the money to an unspecified number of victims by telephone; and (c) collect money in advance by means of the passbook.
[2] On October 6, 2014, the Defendant, along with C, D, E, F, etc., pretended to have a new bank counselor at the Thailand Scam Scam Scam’s office on October 6, 2014, and provided a phone to the victim G. Although there was no intent to open and lend a marina passbook to the victim, it is necessary for the victim to have a performance, such as receiving a loan from other financial rights to create a marina loan account in the given financial institution. It is false that “When transferring the loan amount to the account notified after receiving the loan from other financial rights, the Defendant would have opened a new Masp loan account.”