logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.07.20 2015고단7043
사기방조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Seized evidence 1 to 5 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 7043"

1. On March 2015, the Defendant leased to D, E, F, and G, upon the request of D operating a call center to lease a place to be used as a call center office, H Contac, located in Thailand I, and installed an Internet line within the said office.

D Around that time, D instructed E to install a book, street, telephone, etc. necessary for committing the phishing crime in the above office, and 11 persons such as F and G, etc. who received contact from E directly phone calls from many and unspecified persons, entered the Thailand regardless of Korea to carry out telephone execution affairs by deceiving money, passbook, etc.

After that, 12 persons, such as E, F, and G, who received D’s instructions, were phone numbers secured from March 25, 2015 to June 9, 2015 through an off-to-door call program at the above sub-office office, and the F calls the two victims in name in that time to call to the two victims in the name of the victim, and the F calls the National Bank staff at a low interest rate.

There is a loan product that can be converted from the government to a person who has obtained a loan at a high interest rate from the second financial sphere to a low interest rate loan, and the loan should not be made unless there is a result of the second financial right loan.

Section 2. In case of sending money with a loan from a financial right, conversion will be made.

The Defendant received a total of KRW 22 million, including the receipt of KRW 10 million, KRW 12 million, and KRW 12 million from each of the above victims upon D’s request, and exchanged the above criminal proceeds into Thailand on the condition that 1.5% of the commission was paid upon D’s request.

As such, the Defendant, despite being aware of the fact that D et al. committed the phishing crime, assisted and abetted the act of fraud, such as D, by facilitating the commission of the crime, such as leasing H contact and exchanging the criminal proceeds acquired by them into Thailand.

2. On March 2015, the Defendant assisted the morale of D and Buddhist boxes.

arrow