logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014. 11. 18. 선고 2014누56293 판결
[전부금][미간행]
Plaintiff, Appellant

Hyundai Industrial Development Co., Ltd. (Bae & Yang LLC, Attorneys Lee Dong-jin et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, appellant and appellant

Korea

Conclusion of Pleadings

October 14, 2014

The first instance judgment

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2013Guhap53851 Decided June 5, 2014

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff 10,861,851,886 won with interest rate of 20% per annum from the day after the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case to the day of complete payment.

2. Purport of appeal

In the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant is revoked and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the above revoked part is dismissed (the defendant stated in the petition of appeal that he seeks revocation of the judgment of the court of first instance, but it appears to the purport that he only seeks revocation of the part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance in light of the grounds for appeal, and the plaintiff did not appeal against the judgment of the court of first instance

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this case is as stated in the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except that “If so, the plaintiff’s claim is reasonable, and thus, the plaintiff’s claim of this case shall be accepted within the scope of recognition above, and the remaining claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.” Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, as it is, pursuant to the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance with the same conclusion is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Lee Jong-hun (Presiding Judge) (Presiding Judge)

arrow