logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.08.13 2018고정579
모욕
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 80,000.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 21:00 on January 8, 2018, the Defendant “2018 Highly 579” to the victim C at a 10-person place, including apartment residents, in the office of the representative meeting of occupants of the apartment building B in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and in a 10-person place, including apartment residents.

If a woman intends to engage in a child care center, he/she shall undergo a mental diagnosis, and how to do so by the low-income person;

In a large sense, the victim was openly insultingd by stating that the victim needs mental emotions.

"2018 High 750"

1. On November 20, 2017, at the conference room of Yangcheon-gu Seoul apartment building B on December 20, 2017 and December 20, 18, 2017, the Defendant refers to the victim C, and “it is essential that this woman is working for a child-care center, and it is also problematic in education for a ten-year period for which it is working for a child-care center. Therefore, it is necessary to prevent the child-care center from working in our complex that it is working on, and to prevent the access to the homepage of the representative meeting thereafter.

The victims were openly insultingd by 20 people who need mental emotions in front of the residents in the 20th place, " how women need to see the director of the child-care center."

2. The Defendant: (a) around December 16, 2017 and around December 17, 2017, at the front of the D Childcare Center operated by the injured party No. 112 Dong-dong 110, Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul; and (b) whether the Defendant was a psychiatrist woman;

Whether such a woman will operate his child-care center or not.

“Along with the hearing of security guards, the victim was openly insulting.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on recording;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”) committed the instant crime prior to the filing of a complaint by the injured party.

arrow