The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant was accused of the victim’s complaint on the ground that the victim E, the chairperson of the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council for Residents’ Representatives of Apartment Houses, was a member of the Yangcheon-gu District (G and H)’s (F) foundation in the simultaneous local election on June 4, 2014, when the victim E, who was the chairperson of the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council for Residents’ Representatives of Apartment Houses, had run as a victim’s non-official election campaign leader, but did not pay the victim’s expense.

A. On September 26, 2014, the Defendant insultd on September 26, 2014, on the following grounds: (a) around 22:00 on September 26, 2014, at the office of the representative meeting of occupants of the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council for Residents of D apartment Units, the Defendant, who was witnessed at the office of the representative meeting of occupants, was 20 persons, such as the representative, etc.; (b) as a large interest, to the complainant for the foregoing reason.

The representative of the Dong shall include where the representative of the Dong includes any resident.

In this regard, I would like to find out who would be satisfus with the mind that they want to be satisfus. I would like to find out who would have made the satus when it was established.

It is very far away from the rule of law.

“In other words, the victim was insulting.”

B. On October 15, 2014, the Defendant’s insultd on October 2015, 2014, found in the office of the representative meeting of occupants of Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment buildings around 20:00, and found eight members including the council of occupants’ representatives, and the victim E who convened with eight members including the council of occupants’ representatives, and the victim E would be the victim’s “brupt. Scars will do so by the president and the Dong representative even in how they want to do so.

“In other words, the victim was insulting.”

2. Determination

A. The offense of insult under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which is a crime of insult on September 26, 2014, refers to an offense of insult under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which is the legal interest of protecting an external reputation, meaning a social evaluation of a person’s value, and refers to the expression of an abstract judgment or sacrific sentiment, which does not indicate a fact but could undermine a person’s social assessment.

Therefore, if any expression is not likely to undermine the social evaluation of the other party's personal value, it is somewhat infinite method.