logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2013.10.30 2013고정187
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendants are innocent.

Reasons

1. On June 10, 201, the Defendants: (a) at the large performance hall of the F University Ggym of the Gym of the F University located in E on March 15, 201; (b) at the large performance hall of the Gym of the Japanese Language Department of the said university, Defendant A, who had the victim H(the age of 46) who had the victim’s remarks, snicked the victim’s left hand, and knifed the victim’s knife; and (c) Defendant B, who had the victim’s knife with the said micro, knifed the victim’s left hand by having the victim knifeed with the said micro, and knifed the victim’s knife.”

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the left-hand freshed fresh and the freshed fresh of salt that requires approximately two weeks of treatment on the victim.

2. The summary of the Defendants and the defense counsel’s assertion was that the Defendant did not pressing the victim’s hand, as stated in the facts charged, and the Defendant’s statement was made to the victim, and the Defendant’s victim refused to make a statement to the victim, thereby making the microphone knife knife knife knife knife k

3. Direct evidence corresponding to the facts charged in the instant case is only the victim’s investigative agency and this court’s statement. The issue of the instant case is whether the victim’s statement was credibility or credibility.

Therefore, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, the victim H stated in the investigative agency and this court that “I am hynasium from the victims on June 10, 201 on the day of the incident so that I amhys to the extent that I amhys cannot be properly used, and received medical treatment from the hospital on the following day,” and the medical records of I amhy stated that “I amhys were obtained from the victim on the day of the incident, as stated in the facts charged,” and the victim appears to have stated the cause of the injury differently from the above statement.

arrow