logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2014.06.27 2013고정379
명예훼손등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant: (a) around 11:00 on December 2, 2012, the Defendant: (b) destroyed the Victim E, who was the head of the Diplomatic Association in the ancient-gun C, and was the head of the Diplomatic Association, other than a pastor’s status, attempted to deliver praises and worships; and (c) destroyed the Victim E, who was established on the top of the Diplomatic Association, by double descendants, destroyed and damaged the U.S.’s aesthetic property.

2. The witness E's testimony, the second police's statement to E, the police's statement to F, and the police's statement to E are admissible as evidence corresponding to the above facts charged.

E testified at the police that “the Defendant was flicked and destroyed by flicking microphones on the platform, but the ship did not work in microphones,” and this court testified that “the microphones (referring to the side on which the voice was entered) was carried in hand,” “the fact that the micro was destroyed was destroyed was known for the first time on the following day,” “the Defendant was in appearance separate from micros and spicks when he was found to be microphones,” and “the microphones are not fixed on the subject of lectures.”

However, since the micro stand and parts of micros are strongly combined from the time of micros manufacturing, it is very exceptional to distinguish the microsatis from the microsatis in case of microsatis, ② if the microsatis and parts of microsatis are separated from the microsatis as stated in the E’s statement, it is possible to find out the fact of damage to the microsatis immediately, so the E’s statement that he became aware of the following day is contradictory. ③ According to the witness G’s testimony, only two microsatis and two of the micros subject to lectures are added to the subject of lectures. In full view of the fact that there were no more than two microsatis after the date stated in the instant facts charged, it is difficult to believe the aforementioned statements in E.

In addition, F.

arrow