logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.05.23 2016누82579
토지수용이의재결처분취소등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is as follows: (a) the “H” of the first instance judgment No. 11 is indicated as “D”; (b) the “transfer registration of ownership” of the second 20 of the same face is deemed to be “transfer registration of ownership”; (c) the “Unpaid land” of the third 17 of the same face is deemed to be “unredeemed land”; and (d) the “Unpaid land” of the second 1 of the same face No. 4 as “compensation” is deemed to be “compensation”; and (e) the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (b) Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow