The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The judgment below

Part II "500,000,000 won" of the 18th behavior is "500,000,000," and 4th.

The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the punishment imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, but in full view of various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in this case, it is not recognized that the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable because the punishment imposed by the defendant is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument is without merit.

Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the "500,000 won" in Article 18 of the Criminal Procedure Act of the second half of the judgment of the court below shall be corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure, since the error of "Article 257" in Article 25 (2) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure of the second half of the judgment of the court below, "50,000 won" in Article 14 of the fourth part of the fourth part shall be "the details of the Agricultural Cooperative Account", "Article 260" in the second part of the fifth part shall be "Article 257", and "Article 257" in the third part of the fifth part shall be corrected ex officio pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure.