logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.05.24 2017노671
전자금융거래법위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The judgment below

Part 2 of the 20th page "Article 37 (former part) and Article 38 (1) 2 of the Criminal Code.

Reasons

The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the punishment imposed by the court below (3 million won) is too unreasonable, but in full view of the various circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in this case, the punishment imposed by the court below is too excessive and unfair, and the above argument is without merit.

Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the second half of the judgment of the court below is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act and Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act is clearly erroneous in office under Article 37 of the Criminal Act: Provided, That Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure.

arrow