All appeals by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

The judgment below

"No. 3" of the 4th sentence of the Disposition is "..."

The summary of the grounds for appeal by the Defendants is that the punishment of the lower court (one year of imprisonment, one year of imprisonment, one year of confiscation, eight months of imprisonment, and confiscation) imposed by the Defendants is undue, and the gist of the prosecutor’s appeal is so excessive that the above punishment is unfair and unfair, but in full view of the various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant case, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too heavy or uneasible and unfair. Thus, the Defendants and the prosecutor’s above assertion are all without merit (the “university citizen’s country” of the fourth instance of the lower judgment appears to be “Korea”. Accordingly, pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, all appeals filed by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed, and the judgment of the lower court’s Disposition No. 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act “No. 3” of the Disposition No. 5 of the lower court’s Disposition No. 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act is erroneous and correct ex officio pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.