logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.09.29 2017나2026728
물품대금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the counterclaim in the judgment shall be modified as follows:

Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

Reasons

1. Determination as to the basic facts and the main claim

A. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this part of the judgment of the first instance are as follows: ① each "29,70,000 won" of the second and third parallel parallels 19 and 6 of the second and third parallels 19 and 29,000 won; ③ the "factory of the defendant" of the third parallel 1 is as follows: "the factory of the defendant is on the ground of the Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City factory 93,000,000,000"; ② the "including the number" of the second parallels is as follows: the second parallels is as follows; ② the second parallels 4 from the fourth to the second parallels 5 and the third parallels 2,00,00 won are deleted; ③ the second parallels 5 and the third parallels 6 from the second parallels 5 to the second parallels 16 from the second parallels 3 to the second parallels 6 from the second parallels 16 to the second parallels 3 and 6 from the second parallels 16 to the above judgment.

B. Even if the Plaintiff’s judgment on the grounds for appeal by the Plaintiff is based on the records or images of evidence Nos. 1, 3, 8, and 9, or the result of a partial appraisal by an appraiser A of the first instance trial, it is insufficient to view the instant machine as having the performance generally required by social norms, and thus, it cannot be found any other data to reverse the factual recognition or judgment of the relevant cited part. Thus, the Plaintiff’s ground for appeal on a different premise.

arrow