The sentence of each sentence shall be suspended against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B As faculty members belonging to C University, a person who is in charge of the management of foreign students at C University International Cooperation Center in Korean language and is authorized to enter “foreign student information system” as an electronic record managed by the Ministry of Justice, and Defendant A also is in a position of the head of C University International Cooperation Center as staff members belonging to C University.

The Defendants conspired to conceal the low attendance rate of foreign students by entering false attendance rate in the Foreign Student Information System while taking the measures, on the grounds that there is concern that if the facts were to be known to the Ministry of Justice due to excessive increase in the attendance rate of foreign students in the Korean Language Institute, the non-natural warrant for the foreign students would be refused to leave the Republic of Korea on a large scale, and accordingly, the situation such as cancellation by the C University at the Certification University under 1% is likely to occur.

Accordingly, Defendant B, at the International Cooperation Center of the C University located in Yong-si around February 14, 2018, was in office in the construction site located in the Korean Language Institute from November 2, 2017 to December 8, 2017, and was in office for daily use at the construction site located in the Vietnam city from November 2, 2017 to the date of December 2, 2017. From December 13, 2017 to January 2, 2018, Defendant B was in office for the four semesters of 2017 (from November 6, 2017 to January 19, 2018) and had a public official to peruse the said rate by making it false after having a foreign student information system attend.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to enter false facts in the foreign student information system, which is an electronic record of public offices, and forged the official electronic records and exercised them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement to G, H, I, E, and J. 1.