logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2018. 08. 23. 선고 2018누10406 판결
주식등변동상황명세서 제출일을 증여의제일로 볼 수 있는지 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon District Court-2017-Gu Partnership-102364 (2.01, 2018)

Title

Whether the date of submitting a statement on the status of changes in stocks can be deemed the donation date.

Summary

(1) In the case of a stock title trust, the date on which a statement of change of stocks, etc. is submitted shall be deemed the date of deemed donation in the absence of the register of shareholders. Since the amount of taxation is within the scope of a legitimate tax amount, the

Related statutes

Article 45-2 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Cases

2018Nu10406 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff, Appellant

aa

Defendant, appellant and appellant

The director of the tax office

Judgment of the first instance court

Daejeon District Court 2017Guhap102364 (O2.01, 2018)

Conclusion of Pleadings

July 5, 2018

Imposition of Judgment

August 23, 2018

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's disposition of imposition of KRW 271,770,446 (the portion reverted to the year 2012 and 2014) out of the gift tax of KRW 274,920,110 (the portion reverted to the year 2010, 2012, and 2014) against the plaintiff on August 8, 2016 shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is as stated in the reasoning for the first instance court's decision, except as stated in Paragraph (2). Thus, Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act

In accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, the grounds alleged by the plaintiff in this court, while filing an appeal, are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the first instance, and even if all the evidence submitted to the first instance court and this court are examined, the fact-finding and decision of the first instance court are justified except for the following parts or the parts of the additional

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is justified as it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow