1. On May 8, 2013, the Defendant: (a) on each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff, the Daegu District Court had the jurisdiction over the registration office.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an incorporated association on July 1, 2003, which was established on July 1, 2003 for the purpose of mental education and preliminary education for the purpose of not only contributing to the establishment of unification bureau and the development of the country by succeeding and developing C’s spirit, but also to the establishment of the national government and the cultivation of national spirit.

B. On September 13, 2012, with respect to the Plaintiff Juristic Person, the registration of cancellation of executive officers on the ground of retirement on March 9, 2007 with respect to D, directors E, F, G, H, and I was completed on September 13, 2012, respectively on September 13, 2012 for directors J, K, and L, respectively.

C. Each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) was owned by the Plaintiff. On May 8, 2013, the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Defendant was completed on the ground of the receipt of the Daegu District Court’s registration office from No. 7244 on May 7, 2013 (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”).

On September 13, 2012, the Seoul Eastern District Court 2016Gahap100957, the above D filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff Corporation (representative J), such as the registration of cancellation of each of the above executives, and the confirmation of non-existence of the resolution to appoint K and L as director at the general meeting on September 13, 2012, which caused the registration of cancellation of directors, and the registration of appointment of directors. The above court confirmed that each of the above resolutions did not exist on October 11, 2016.

Plaintiff

A corporation appealed to the above judgment as Seoul High Court No. 2016Na2074973, but the above court dismissed the appeal by the Plaintiff corporation on April 6, 2017, and the same month.

4. 27. Each of the above judgments became final and conclusive.

E. As a director with the representative authority of the Plaintiff corporation, the J, which completed each of the instant registrations of the instant real estate to the Defendant, is the husband of the Defendant.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, each entry in Gap evidence 1 through 5 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The judgment on the defense of this case is null and void without any ground for each registration of ownership transfer of this case.