logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2018.01.10 2017나14503
이사지위부존재확인등
Text

1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The defendant is a medical corporation established on October 26, 2010 for the purpose of establishing and operating medical institutions.

The plaintiffs and J were appointed as the defendant's promoters for the establishment of the defendant, and the term of office of the plaintiffs and J was expired on October 26, 2013.

The defendant's resolution of the board of directors held on July 31, 2013. At the time, the defendant's directors were the plaintiffs, K, J, L5.

The above board of directors attended by four directors except J as listed below, among which directors K and L among them submitted a letter of resignation, and a resolution was passed to appoint M, N,O, P as directors with the consent of all members present at the board of directors, and M as directors with the power of representation.

On August 14, 2013, the Defendant’s minutes (Evidence 2-2) of the board of directors were prepared as of August 14, 2013, as the following: K, L director appointment: M, N,O, and P representative director (president): Plaintiff BK J x L x L x L 2-2.

The meeting minutes of the above board of directors were held on August 14, 2013 by the defendant's board of directors, and the following seven directors (Plaintiffs, J, M, N,O, P) of the defendant were present at the meeting of the plaintiff, M, N,O, P, and Q, R, and S with the consent of all members present at the meeting.

(2) On February 26, 2014, the Plaintiff and the JJ held the board of directors on the following grounds: (a) whether the Plaintiff was present at the board of directors; (b) whether the Plaintiff was present at the board of directors; (c) Q, R, and S; and (c) whether the Plaintiff was present at the board of directors: Q, R, and S; (d) the Plaintiff and the JJ held the board of directors on February 26, 2014; and (c) the Plaintiffs and the Defendant as indicated in the table below.

A. As seen in paragraph 2, the term of office as a director was expired as of October 26, 2013. As seen in paragraph 2, M, P, Q, R, and 7 were present at the Defendant’s director, and N andO were resolved to dismiss the director with the consent of all the members present at the meeting (hereinafter referred to as “the resolution”).

arrow