1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The pertinent land (hereinafter “instant land”) was registered under the name of an incorporated association E (hereinafter “instant corporation”). However, on May 7, 2013, the same month was based on the grounds of sale and purchase on May 7, 2013.

8. The registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the plaintiff.

B. The Defendant occupies the instant land by cultivating rice on the instant land, etc.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Eul's evidence 3-1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff asserted by the parties against the Defendant as the owner of the instant land, claiming unjust enrichment on the part of the Defendant by collecting rice plants planted on the ground, transferring the said land, and completing the delivery.

The defendant asserts that the land of this case is registered in the name of the plaintiff, but it is not owned by the plaintiff, so it cannot respond to the plaintiff's claim.

3. Determination

A. The following facts can be acknowledged in light of the overall purport of the pleadings in each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 7, 9, and Eul evidence Nos. 3-1, 2, 4-2, 5, 7, and 8.

1) The instant legal entity is an incorporated association established on July 1, 2003 for the purpose of improving the F’s spirit and contributing not only to the construction of a unification bureau by succeeding and developing the F’s spirit, but also to the development of the country, and for the purpose of mental education for the establishment of the national government and the fostering of national spirit, and for the purpose of field education projects. 2) On September 13, 2012, with respect to the instant legal entity, the registration of cancellation of the officer registration for the chief executive officer G, G, H, I, J, K, and L on March 9, 207, was completed on September 13, 201, respectively.

3) As Seoul Eastern District Court 2016Gahap100957, the foregoing G confirmed the absence of the “a resolution to appoint M as a director with the power of representation, N, andO at the general meeting on September 13, 2012,” which caused the registration of cancellation of each of the above executives against the representative M B, and the registration of appointment of directors.”