logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.08.10 2018고단368
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine for 100,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On October 10, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million due to a violation of road traffic law (drinking driving) in the Gwangju District Court’s Support on the 100,000 won, and on October 22, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 6 million due to a violation of road traffic law (dacting measurement) in the same court.

[Criminal facts]

1. On May 4, 2018, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluoring to take a drinking test) on the road front of the Mapo Women's High School in the Mapo-dong at the time of Mapo-si on May 21:17, 2018, the Defendant driven the above Mana under the influence of under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling alcohol in front of the Mapo-gu Women's High School in the Mapo-dong at the time of Mapo-si, and driving the Mapo-gu under the influence of alcohol, after passing beyond the road front of the Mapo-ro 13-4, a Mapo-ro 13-4, a Mapo-ro, a Mapo-gu Police Station: (a) who was under the influence of alcohol, after receiving a report that “the Defendant was driving in excess of Mapo-gu

Even if there are reasonable grounds to recognize it, the police officer did not comply with a request for the measurement of drinking without justifiable grounds, even though he/she was requested to respond to the measurement of drinking by inserting the whole 21:45 on the same day into a drinking measuring instrument.

2. On May 4, 2018, the Defendant was driving C X-E-E-on without obtaining a motor device driver’s license from the front side of the Mapo Women’s High School located in the Mapodong-dong-dong-si on May 4, 2018 to the front side of the Mapo Women’s High School No. 86, 13-4, 13-4, a similar Sim-ro Do-ro Do-ro Do-ro Do-ro Do-ro.

3. No owner of a motor vehicle who has violated the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Insurance shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not purchase mandatory insurance, but operated C X-E oba, as described in paragraph (2).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The situation report of the driver in charge and the driver in charge; and

arrow