Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine for 100,000 won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] On October 10, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million due to a violation of road traffic law (drinking driving) in the Gwangju District Court’s Support on the 100,000 won, and on October 22, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 6 million due to a violation of road traffic law (dacting measurement) in the same court.
[Criminal facts]
1. On May 4, 2018, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluoring to take a drinking test) on the road front of the Mapo Women's High School in the Mapo-dong at the time of Mapo-si on May 21:17, 2018, the Defendant driven the above Mana under the influence of under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling alcohol in front of the Mapo-gu Women's High School in the Mapo-dong at the time of Mapo-si, and driving the Mapo-gu under the influence of alcohol, after passing beyond the road front of the Mapo-ro 13-4, a Mapo-ro 13-4, a Mapo-ro, a Mapo-gu Police Station: (a) who was under the influence of alcohol, after receiving a report that “the Defendant was driving in excess of Mapo-gu
Even if there are reasonable grounds to recognize it, the police officer did not comply with a request for the measurement of drinking without justifiable grounds, even though he/she was requested to respond to the measurement of drinking by inserting the whole 21:45 on the same day into a drinking measuring instrument.
2. On May 4, 2018, the Defendant was driving C X-E-E-on without obtaining a motor device driver’s license from the front side of the Mapo Women’s High School located in the Mapodong-dong-dong-si on May 4, 2018 to the front side of the Mapo Women’s High School No. 86, 13-4, 13-4, a similar Sim-ro Do-ro Do-ro Do-ro Do-ro Do-ro.
3. No owner of a motor vehicle who has violated the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Insurance shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;
Nevertheless, the Defendant did not purchase mandatory insurance, but operated C X-E oba, as described in paragraph (2).
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. The situation report of the driver in charge and the driver in charge; and