1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. In accordance with the Administration of the Plaintiff A, added by this Court, the Defendant.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as set forth in paragraph (2) below, and thus, it cited it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The portion of the first instance judgment that is dismissed or added is as follows: (a) 6 Myeon 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance “wages and retirement allowances” shall be dismissed as “wages, retirement allowances and annual allowances”; and (b) the lower part’s list shall be as follows.

(1) Plaintiff A’s annual retirement allowance of KRW 52,916,66 from January 1, 2018 to October 31, 2018 and KRW 84,66,66 from January 1, 2018 to October 31, 2018, Plaintiff A’s retirement allowance of KRW 84,66,66 from January 1, 2018 to October 31, 2018, Plaintiff A’s retirement allowance of KRW 145,87,000 from January 1, 2012 to October 31, 2018, Plaintiff A’s retirement allowance of KRW 44,645,460 from February 8, 209 to October 31, 2018, and Plaintiff B’s unpaid retirement allowance of KRW 505,960 from January 1, 2013 to Plaintiff A’s annual retirement allowance of KRW 18,209.

In the first instance judgment 10th 6th 6th 6th 201, “only the Plaintiffs’ benefits from January 1, 2018 to May 31, 2018” means that “The Plaintiffs’ benefits from January 1, 2018 to May 31, 2018 and annual allowances from May 2013 to 2017 are limited to the Plaintiffs’ annual allowances.”

In the first instance judgment, the 12th to 13th to 13th of the 12th of the 12th of the judgment are as follows:

Article 1 of the share purchase contract of this case provides that Defendant D shall take over all of Defendant C’s shares 40,000 shares owned by the transferor of this case from the transferor of this case, and Defendant D shall take over the management rights of Defendant C through due process. Thus, the plaintiffs can be deemed to have entered into the share purchase contract of this case in the status of the transferor of shares, as well as the status of the transferor of management rights of Defendant C, as the status of the transferor of management rights of Defendant C, and as the status of the transferee of shares and the transferee of management rights of Defendant C. Thus, the plaintiffs are the management rights of Defendant C with interest of the transferor of shares, and are managed by Defendant D and Defendant D.