logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.19 2017나79136
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. The part to be dismissed or added is that “6 No. 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance” shall be deemed to be “6 of the evidence (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply).”

In the fourth statement of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "food waste flag 2" in the No. 1-2 of the column 1 to the "food waste bag" shall be deemed to be "food waste bag," and the "reasons for the statement of false facts or insult" in the second statement shall be deemed to be "food waste bag" respectively.

The Serial 12 in the fifth table of the judgment of the court of first instance refers to the "not to sit" in the 8th sentence.

The 8th judgment of the first instance court "the time of false death" in the 20th judgment is regarded as "the time of false facts".

The following shall be added to the 12th instance judgment following the 11th instance judgment:

“In the instant broadcast, it is difficult to view each issue speech made by Defendant D, E, and F, and the instant caption sent by Defendant C from the instant broadcast as a statement of fact or false fact subject to the liability for damages due to defamation or insult, and it is difficult to view that the Plaintiffs’ assertion against the Defendants is a statement of fact or a statement of false fact, which is subject to the liability for damages due to defamation or insult. Therefore, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiffs’ assertion against the Defendants is based on a different premise, and therefore, is without merit.”

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and all appeals against the Defendants are dismissed.

arrow