logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2013.07.17 2013고단367
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 13, 2012, the Defendant: (a) had sexual intercourse with F and F on the condition that he had a sexual intercourse with F and F, the Defendant: (b) had a sexual intercourse with F and F, and (c) had granted F and F, 30,000 won in Busan, KTX 1 and 50,000 won in cash to F, which are equivalent to the market price, around September 13, 2012.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of F's accusation Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 10(1) of the former Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (amended by Act No. 11572, Dec. 18, 2012; hereinafter the same shall apply) on criminal facts

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 60 (3) of the Juvenile Act;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 13(1) and (2) of the former Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, claiming that the said F was unaware of the fact that the Defendant was a juvenile at the time of sexual intercourse.

In full view of the fact that the police stated that the defendant was the 94-year child earlier before entering the above telecom, as the defendant, and that the defendant was the 1.5 million won criminal punishment due to the criminal fact that the defendant had committed an act of purchasing the sex of a juvenile aged 18 May 2, 2012, and that the other party to the act of purchasing sex through the Internet hosting site is the juvenile and the other party is the second half of the death, it is reasonable to deem that the defendant was aware that the F was the juvenile at the time of sexual intercourse.

With respect to the crime of this case in which personal information is registered and submitted.

arrow