A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

One copy of the forged check of 100,000 won seized shall be pressured by Seoul Dong District Prosecutors' Office in 2013.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 5, 2013, the Defendant, at the coffee shop in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, copied a copy of a combined office automation system with the purpose of exercising the right, presented to the victim who was aware of the forgery as if he genuinely formed a 1 balance of 4,000 won in the amount of 4,00 won in the market price and 96,000 won in the amount of 1 balance of 4,000 won in the market price from the victim, and acquired the forged balance by using it.

2. On August 6, 2013, around 23:07, the Defendant presented one 10,000 cashier’s checks (one 17,000 won of the national bank tin village east Branch and N) that were forged by copying it with multiple office automation devices for the purpose of exercising at the AT point in the operation of the victim BG located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, to the victim who was aware of the forgery, as if they were genuinely formed, and then wrongfully acquired the forged amount by obtaining 17,00 won of the daily market price from the victim and 83,000 won of the Scream sum and 83,000 won of the forged amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of BG;

1. A written accusation;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV photographs;

1. Relevant Articles 217 and 214 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 217 and 214 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment, and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of fraud and the choice of imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)2 of the Criminal Act for forfeiture is that the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, but he again commits the crime in this case and did not recover damage, etc., and that the defendant is divided his mistake, and circumstances favorable to him, such as the fact that the amount of damage is minor, the age, character and conduct, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime.