The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On March 22, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 from the Jeonju District Court to a fine of KRW 700,00 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a fine of KRW 1.5 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Jeonju District Court on May 4, 2015, respectively.

On March 5, 2016, the Defendant, at around 18:42, driven C Leto-Ba truck in approximately 8km from 1563 to 2nd roads in the Jinanan-gun, Jinan-gun, Jinan-gun, Jinan-gun, Jinan-gun, the alcohol level of which is 0.065%.

2. The facts found based on the evidence adopted and examined by the court are as follows.

On March 5, 2016, at around 18:42, the Defendant driven a Letotop or cargo vehicle, traveling along the road located in Jinanan-gun B in the Jinan-gun from the direction of the movement to the Jinan-ean-ean-ean-ean-eg., the Defendant caused an accident where the vehicle moves to the farmland located in the direction

(b) A police officer who was dispatched to an accident scene after receiving a report was unable to find a driver at the scene;

On the same day, police officers visited the "E" drinking house located in D, which is the address of the owner of the vehicle (defendants) at around 19:40 on the same day, and found out that the defendant is walking with his wife, East F.

C. At the time, the Defendant: (a) driven an accident vehicle; (b) did not drive a taxi at the scene of the accident; and (c) claimed that he drank a taxi at around 17:00 on the same day; and (d) took the same day.

Police officers measured the alcohol level to the defendant on the same day at around 20:11, and as a result, the blood alcohol level of the defendant was measured at 0.209%.

3. Issues and judgments

A. Based on the fact that the police in question 1,875ml 1,875ml (i.e., 10ml, the amount claimed by the defendant at the time of interrogation of the police, which is the most favorable to the defendant among the statements made by the defendant at the investigation stage) after the defendant was killed after the accident, the police in question is under the so-called Radmark formula after the accident.