logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.04.01 2015고단348
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be determined by one year and six months of imprisonment.

Seized divers (No. 35) shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 25, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1 million by larceny, etc. at the Jeonju District Court on March 25, 2010; on April 22, 2010, the same court was notified of a summary order of KRW 300,000 by larceny; on February 8, 2011, the Defendant had the record of being sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten years by imprisonment with prison labor for night building intrusion, larceny, etc. at the same court.

1. At night, at around 13:00 on December 18, 2014, the Defendant habitually stolen, or attempted to steals, property worth KRW 6,25,00,00 in total of the market price by the same method over 21 times until January 14, 2015, with two copies (No. 14), seals (No. 13), resident registration certificates (No. 15), etc. in the market value, which is the market value of the victim’s ownership, after having opened a door-to-door door in the victim G located in Jinando-gun-gun, Jindo-gun, North Korea, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft; and (b) committed a crime without having habitually stolen, or attempted to steals, property worth KRW 6,25,00 in the same way as indicated in attached Table 1.

2. As described in the above paragraph (1), the Defendant discovered that the number of passwords is indicated on the back of the passbook in the name of G, which was stolen, as indicated in the above paragraph (1), and had the intent to withdraw the deposit using the seal of G, which was stolen together with the passbook. On December 18, 2014, the Defendant used “W”, “W”, “X0,000,000”, “X”, and “X”, “The date of preparation,” and “GG”, and then enter the name “BG” on the back of the passbook in the name of G, which was stolen, with the seal affixed to the passbook, and intended to withdraw the deposit. From December 18, 2014, the Defendant exercised the said document’s name by forging the deposit in the name of G, which is a private document’s right and duty, with the seal affixed by G, and then, exercised the said document’s name and delivery to the said employee, and issued it to the said employee.

arrow