logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.11.15 2017고단1136
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for one year with prison labor for Defendant K.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] On March 28, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months, Defendant K was sentenced to imprisonment for six months, and Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment for eight months, and on April 5, 2013. On June 19, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for two years, with prison labor for two years, and Defendant K was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for two years, with prison labor for eight months, and the judgment on June 27, 2013 was finalized.

[Criminal facts] Defendant K became aware of the victim N as an investor while operating the Asset Management Company M.

The Defendants, as a form of punishment, have attempted to acquire money by deceiving the victim as he could raise a large amount of profit by running Internet shopping business by Defendant A, who is a mother and child, in selling money to the Internet gambling.

Defendant

K on January 201, 201, by phone call from the victim at the non-permanent area, K may obtain stable income from the residents in the Internet shopping business.

B. The project will also be implemented.

It is possible to gain high profit from lending money.

After making a false statement, Defendant A introduced Defendant A, and Defendant A made a false statement when purchasing goods in China and selling them to Internet shopping companies, which would have a considerable profit, thereby causing investment for the same business.

However, at the time, the Defendants did not operate the Internet shopping business, and Defendant A thought that they would be used for the Internet gambling business or the Internet gambling business even if receiving money from the victims, but was in a situation in which they could not gain profits definitely through the above Internet gambling. Defendant K was well aware of these circumstances, and the Defendants did not have any intent or ability to pay profits within a short period, and did not have any ability to repay money without any specific property.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim as above and deception the victim from the damaged person for business purposes on January 201, 201.

arrow