Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of two years and six months, and by imprisonment for a term of one year.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

[Judgment of the court below] Defendant A is a person who gives money through publicity of gambling sites, sales of personal information, etc., and Defendant B is a web designer with Defendant A’s leakage.

Defendant

A attempted to operate a gambling publicity site to the same effect by imitateing a lot of money under the pretext of preventing so-called so-called “fashing (or closing a site without providing gambling even after receiving money)”. However, as the Internet site is insufficient to produce, A requested Defendant B to produce the gambling promotion site. Defendant B was in charge of manufacturing the promotion site and managing the operating profit of the said site at Defendant A’s request.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. On March 2019, Defendant A planned to open and operate a so-called “D” site in collusion with Defendant A on the pretext of verifying the so-called “frying” site at an influorite site. Defendant B asked Defendant B to produce the said site, and Defendant B produced the said site at Defendant A’s request.

On March 14, 2019, the Defendants posted an advertisement stating that “E” from a person who operates a private gambling site, which is a private gambling site, was asked to publicize and request the above “E” site, and received 300,000 won in return.

From around that time to June 15, 2020, the Defendants aided and abetted the operation of the above-mentioned gambling site, and 107,140,000 won as advertising price.

B. Defendant A, in violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, may pose a risk to the name of the business partner, who was a senior policeman on February 2020.