A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 2014, the Defendant received a notification from the victim on the ground that the victim D (n, 46 years of age) who had a spouse had met at a golf course or returned to one another at a golf course, and that he would look at the family from the victim.

1. On May 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Utilization, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (hereinafter “Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection Act”), such as “I sees the victim’s speech at an insular place and sees the victim’s phone, she reached repeatedly the victim’s text that arouses fear or apprehension by sending a cell phone text message to the same content as the list of the crimes committed in the annexed crime list, including: “I see why I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am am, I am, I am am, I am am, I am am, I am, I am am, I am am am, I am am, I am am am., I am am am., I am am., I am.

2. The Defendant, who received a notice from the victim, received 20 million won as the expenses incurred in talking with the victim and having entered the scene during the process of having received such notice from the victim. The Defendant was willing to receive 20 million won.

On July 25, 2014, at around 14:00 on July 25, 2014, the Defendant repeatedly made a phone call to the victim or sent text messages to the victim with the same content as that set forth in paragraph (1) at the intercompact shop opened in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government opened, and took the same attitude that if the victim does not pay 20 million won to the victim by either talking the victim as if he was erroneous to the husband of the victim, making a telephone as if he was the victim’s husband or her mother, or attempting the victim by talking the victim to the victim, the Defendant continued to attract the victim or her family members, or making the relationship between the victim and her husband.

Thus, the defendant attacked the victim as above.