All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s respective sentences against the Defendants (the Defendants: 10 months of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) are too unreasonable.

2. The Defendants’ confession and reflect on the instant crime, and the fact that the period of operation of the instant illegal game room is not long, is favorable to the Defendants.

However, as to the crime of this case, illegal game room business, such as the crime of this case, promoted an excessive spirit of gambling to the general public, and undermining sound labor awareness, and thus, the nature of the crime is not good, and thus, it is necessary to strictly punish the Defendants since continuous control is not eradicated. The Defendants committed the same crime without being able to have been punished several times of the same crime. In particular, Defendant A again committed the same crime after being sentenced to a suspended sentence for the same kind of crime. In full view of all kinds of sentencing conditions, including the size of the game of this case’s game room business, including the defendants’ age, character and behavior, environment, motive, circumstances, degree of participation, degree of participation, etc., the punishment of the lower court against the defendants is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.