logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.06.17 2016고단70
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, who is a foreigner of Chinese nationality, was issued a passport under the name of “B” and entered Korea around May 30, 2007.

On February 3, 2014, at around 23:10, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender in the crime of bodily injury due to the suspicion of committing an injury at the 137 large-scale 7 large-scale 7 large-scale Ga Ga-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and on February 4, 2014, at the office of the Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Police Station type, located in 608 as the National Assembly of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, as the National Assembly, and was investigated by the Do-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, and without authority, the Defendant had the above D enter the name of the Defendant and the foreigner registration number (F) in the E-mail interrogation protocol on the suspect interrogation, and forged the Defendant’s signature by signing the name “G” on the closed statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol and affixing it on the name side.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged another person’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

2. Around February 4, 2014, the Defendant, at the above Seoul Young-gu Police Station type: (a) on February 4, 2014, exercised the suspect interrogation protocol, stating a forged signature, on the one hand, to the police officer and office of the above Seoul Young-gu Police Station type: (b) as if the signature was genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Part concerning E-statements in the second prosecutor's examination protocol against the accused;

1. A copy of the decision to correct the indication of parties in Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2014 High Court Decision 2935 High Court Decision, 2015 early 2015;

1. Results of fingerprint search;

1. Application of statutes on copies of individual immigration status;

1. Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 239 of the Criminal Act on the crime) and Article 239 (2) and Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act on the crime (the point of exercising the above investigation signature);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Whether the sentencing criteria are applied: Whether the sentencing criteria are not set;

2. The defendant shall be sentenced to a sentence;

arrow