A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. A larceny Defendant: (a) around 23:00 on May 23, 2015, in the case of the Victim Co., Ltd., Ltd., 15, Jung-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Seoul, in which the management of employees of the said company was neglected, used a gap that is equivalent to KRW 11,000, the market price of the victim-owned 11,000, 3,200, 6,000, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 6,00,000, 3, the Vene f, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 6,49,00; and (b) 1,70, 300, 300,000, 1, 3,000, 3,00,000 won.

A total amount of 33,690 won, such as 1 rice mills, which is equivalent to 2,000 won in the city, was stolen with articles equivalent to 3,690 won.

2. Around May 24, 2015, the Defendant signed a private signature: (a) around 00:30 on May 24, 2015, at the central district of the police station in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Seoul, for the same reason as indicated in paragraph (1) around 23:30 on May 23, 2015, the Defendant acquired the private signature as a current offender for the same reason as indicated in paragraph (1) at the police station in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and entered B’s signature in the confirmation document verifying that the Defendant was issued a legitimate opportunity upon receiving notice of the summary of the suspected crime, etc. as a result of the arrest of the current offender.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged another person’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

3. Around May 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) submitted to the police officer affiliated with the said patrol unit a confirmation letter stating the forged B’s signature, as described in paragraph (2), at the central district of the police station in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Seoul, on the 46-gil of War (14), around May 24, 2015; and (b) exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written confirmation, a photograph of damaged articles, and a criminal investigation report (victim telephone investigation);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 329 of the choice of punishment (abstinence, a punishment by imprisonment), Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (abstinence of a private signature) and Article 239 (2) of the Criminal Act (a point of exercising a signature of the above investigation);

1. Article 37 of the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes Act.