The Defendants jointly share KRW 92,158,652 to Plaintiff A, KRW 1,00,000 to Plaintiff B, and KRW 50,000 to Plaintiff C, respectively.

Basic Facts

Defendant D’s status as the parties is operating F Council members (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and Defendant E is a doctor working at Defendant Hospital.

Plaintiff

A is a patient who received the oral surgery from Defendant E at the Defendant Hospital, and Plaintiff B is the spouse of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C is an infant of Plaintiff A.

The plaintiff A et al. of the defendant hospital was treated with hyeological pain from around August 2010. The plaintiff A et al. was treated with hyeological therapy in the H Hospital, etc. after receiving hyeological surgery from Galeological surgery.

Plaintiff

On July 25, 2011, A complained of the pains, such as Huuri and the right leg, Mali-ri, Mali-ri, and Mali-ri, Mali-ri.

As a result of the examination of the plaintiff A, the defendant D diagnosed the name of the plaintiff A as ① the escape from a warning signboard up to 4-5 on the right side, ② the right side escape from a warning signboard up to 1,00, ② the side side side of the 5th trends-1,000.

Plaintiff

A was hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital on July 27, 201, around 12:10, and on the same day, Defendant E performed the Plaintiff’s oral surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”), and the instant surgery was completed at around 18:30.

Plaintiff

A appealed from the instant surgery to the point of view and above, A complained of the degree of weakening and sense of influence not to the right after the instant surgery. On July 27, 201, as a result of the neological examination measured around 18:40 on July 27, 2011, A showed Maradeabasis indicating that the exercise ability of the neighboring land controlled by the 5th Megade (the complete paralysis of the exercise ability of the neighboring land) or Grade 1 (the degree of only the evidence of the nearby land meat) was shown.

Accordingly, from the result of spine MI test conducted by the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital against the Plaintiff A, the outcome of blood species occurrence was observed between the 4-5 trend on the right side.

On July 27, 2011, Defendant D explained to Plaintiff A that he should undergo the surgery on blood transfusion, and agreed to conduct an emergency surgery by communicating with I Hospital, and then Plaintiff A was subject to all measures to Plaintiff A.

. at the I Hospital.