logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2015.08.21 2014재가합2006
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The retrial of this case and the motion for participation of the independent party intervenor shall be dismissed in all.

2. Requests for retrial:

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff manages five (5 (5 (5 (5 (00), with the aim of cultivating, cultivating, and promoting the virtue business of DC C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C and cultivating and promoting the spirit of respect and respect for the management of the family and clan property, a popular species consisting of descendants of E (1 E), Cheongsong-gun (2 E), 2P (2L), 3 years old-si (3 years old-old G and their spouse), 5 years old-gun (4 years old-old G and their spouse), and Cheongju-si (4 years old-old spouse J).

Shebly, the Defendant is in the middle of three years of age G, who is the son of E, and is in the middle of the subsequent generations.

B. During the 1910s, each of the lands before the following subdivisions and changes in the name of the administrative district (hereinafter “instant assessment land”) were identified as follows: (i) through (7); (ii) through (i) the land was under the name of KLMNPOP Q; and (iii) the land was under the name of R.

① Gyeonggi-gun Scenic-gun 20th 4th 3th 1st 1st 1st 1st 3th 1st 1st 1st 1st 3th 1st 1st 1st 3th 1st 3th 3th 1st 5th 4th st 5th st 4th st 5th st 5th st 4th st 5th st 1st 4th 2th st 4th st 2th fth 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 29th 2962 where the land in this case was completed in the name of the defendant around March 29, 1962.

C. (i) In the instant assessment land, among the land divided into the land (iii), AD forest 475 square meters, AE forest 928 square meters, and 1,271 square meters of AF forest and 94 square meters of AG forest and 94 square meters of land (hereinafter “the instant land”) were included in the part of AH road package construction project, in the case of the inner-type divided from the land.

B. On March 7, 2013, the Defendant held an extraordinary general meeting of a clan and decided to sell the land expropriated in this case to Gyeonggi-do (the euthane of business management), and entered into a public land consultation agreement with Haman on April 2013, and entered into such agreement with Gyeonggi-do.

arrow