logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2015.04.22 2014가합8419
보상금반환
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit include the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged by comprehensively considering the following facts: Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 3-1 through 18, Gap evidence 7, Gap evidence 8-1 through 4, Gap evidence 10-1, 2, Gap evidence 11, Gap evidence 12, Gap evidence 13-1 through 3, Gap evidence 14-1 through 5, Gap evidence 15-1, 16-1, 2, 19, Gap evidence 20-1, Gap evidence 48-1, 2, Eul evidence 3, and Eul evidence 3.

The plaintiff manages five (5 (5 (5 (5 (00), including Cheong-gun, Cheong-gun, Ha-Eup (2-Ga), Masung-si (3-H and her spouse), Macheon-gun (4-J), Cheongju (4-si's spouseK), and Cheong-si (4-si's spouseK), with the aim of cultivating the business of E Sin-si and cultivating and promoting the spirit of respect and respect for the care of the family and family property and the management of the family property of F.

Luxembourg The Defendant’s clan was in the middle of 3 years of age H, the grandchildren of F, and was composed of descendants. Defendant C was the representative of the Defendant clan from September 4, 2013 to January 27, 2014, and Defendant D was the wife of Defendant C.

B. During the 1910s, each land prior to the following subdivisions and changes in the name of administrative district (hereinafter “instant assessment land”), among the land (i) through (7), (i) through (i) the land was under the name of LMNP QR, and (ii) the land was under the name of S.

(1) The 5th 20th 4th 3th 1st 1st f1st f1st f1st f1st f1st f1st f1st f1st f1st f1st f1st f1st f1st f1st f1st f1st f2th f1st f1st f1st f1st f2th f1st f1st f2th f1st f1st f2th f1st f1st 2th f1st f2th f2th f1st f1th f1st f1st f1st f1st f1st f1st f2nd f1st f3th f1st f1st f3th f1st f1st

arrow