Main Issues
The meaning of "Carrying" under Article 3 (1) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act
Summary of Judgment
The term "Carrying" of dangerous objects under Article 3 (1) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act refers to carrying the following dangerous objects, which are intended to be used in committing a crime at the scene of the crime, and therefore, it cannot be said that the mailing the degree of 2g of the liquidation salt reaches the victim by mailing them in a letter of intimidation.
[Reference Provisions]
Article 3(1) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act
Reference Cases
Supreme Court Decision 81Do3074 Delivered on February 23, 1982, 83Do2959 Delivered on January 31, 1984
Escopics
Defendant
upper and high-ranking persons
Prosecutor
Judgment of the lower court
Busan District Court Decision 85No1231 delivered on July 18, 1985
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined.
The term “Carrying” of a dangerous object as referred to in Article 3(1) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act refers to carrying a dangerous object under the intention to use at the scene of crime, and thus, it cannot be deemed as carrying a dangerous object as referred to in the above Article 3(1) of the same Act merely by mailing the degree of 2g of liquidation salt to the victim by means of intimidation. There is no error in the misapprehension of legal principles, such as the theory of lawsuit.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
Justices Kang Jin-young (Presiding Justice)