Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 13, 2019, at around 20:20, the Defendant assaulted, without any justifiable reason, 112 persons on the street in front of the restaurant “C” in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Police Station D District D District of Daejeon-gu, which was called upon to move from the border E to a limited place to verify the circumstances of the instant case, on his hand, the Defendant: (a) assaulted the two descendants; (b) attempted to keep the two shoulder of the said E; and (c) attempted to move to the district after the locked by the locked by the said E; and (d) tried to move to the district after the locked by the locked by the said E; and (e) asked one of them to put in the right part of the F in front of the front part; and (e) asked them to put the front part of the f in the front part of the e-mail, and to put the e-mail back one of them to the right part.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement to F and E;

1. 12Report sheet, work log in the D District, and investigation report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing criminal video CDs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of a fine of choice of punishment (in light of the background and content of the instant crime, necessity for punishing the crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties, degree of exercise of force at the time, etc., the liability for the relevant crime was unfastened, the Defendant was divided in depth, and the police officers were not injured, and the damaged police officers wanted to have the Defendant’s wife, and at the time of the court’s sentencing investigation, the victimized police officers wanted to have the Defendant divided into the Defendant’s body, and the victimized police officers wanted to have the Defendant’s wife for the future at the time of the court’s sentencing investigation, and considering the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, such as the circumstance that the Defendant was the first offender, and the adult was the first adult

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;