logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.04.01 2015고단7598
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) requested F to leave the site on the ground that he was suffering from disturbance at the D main points located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon on October 5, 2015; (b) on the entrance of the main point, F to leave the site; and (c) F to the entrance of the main point; (d) “F to shot out”; and (e) “Ih Hah Hah Hah Hah Hah Hah Hah Hah Hahh.

“Along with approximately 20 minutes of disturbance, such as continuing sound, taking a bath, and breaking it in stairs, etc., which had been in the main points at the time.

70 to 80 customers go out of the main store, and they are unable to enter the store, and thus interfere with the victim G's main business by force.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties was arrested of the victim H and I as a suspect of interference with duties in the police station E zone belonging to the Samsan Police Station, at the above date, at the place, and during the time and time, on board the patrol vehicle and moving the patrol vehicle to Samsan Police Station.

The Defendant, on the ground that the police officers were able to boom her face at the right seat of the Defendant, led the victim H to walk 7-8 times at the right seat of the Defendant, taken the face one time at the right seat of the Defendant, took the face once again, and the victim avoided it, asked the left side immediately once. The victim, who was seated above the Defendant’s left side, took an assault, such as the victim I’s buckbucks inside each side of the port side of the Defendant, and 3-4 kid off the front side of the right seat, and obstructed the police officers and I’s legitimate performance of official duties concerning the escort.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of statutes on police statements made to I, H, and G;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of interference with business) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (limited to cases where a person interferes with the execution of each official duty);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1.Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution (hereinafter referred to as the following):

arrow