The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of the grounds for appeal;

A. There is no fact that the Defendant spits or spits a bath against the victim C, or spits or spits it, and spits at the entrance of spits, thereby obstructing the passage of customers.

B. The Defendant did not take a bath against the victim C and F.

C. While the Defendant was aware of the fact that he was pushed ahead of his name at the police police team, the Defendant did not know that he was damaged by his own act.

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts charged, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, ① the victim C requested the investigative agency to help the low-income female customers to satis at the time, “I would like to satis at the outside.” Therefore, the defendant continued to hold the test business to the effect that the test business was illegal, and the defendant satisfs down and sats it.” The victim F, the dispatched police officer, made a concrete statement on the background of the case and the facts of the damage. ② The victim F, who was the dispatched police officer, was dispatched to the site after receiving a report, was interfering with the business by hanging theme floor between the entrance and the path of the bar, and the defendant interfered with the business. Also, the defendant made a statement to the effect that “The victim C satisf satisf satisf satisf satisf sats at the Gu office to contact him with him, and the victim’s motive or CCTV will not be s credibility.