The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal clearly states that the witness who observed the situation at the time of the instant case clearly stated that F did not assault the Defendant, so long as the Defendant was assaulted by F and reported to the police fraudulently, the Defendant may sufficiently recognize the offense of false accusation against the Defendant.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the partial statement of witnesses G of the party, the Defendant and F spits each other before the day of the instant case, and spits or spits, which are spits or spits expenses, so that appraisal is not good. ② On the day of the instant case, F spits or spits the Defendant who emitted from the instant case, and expressed spits to the competent government office as to the violation of the total amount of transportation revenue management system, and spits or spits against the Defendant, and the Defendant also set up against F spits or spits by stating that “When the Defendant wanted to go in the bar room, spits and spits were paid by a fine for negligence on account of the Defendant and the Defendant, and spits and spits the Defendant on the day of the instant assault or spits by using the Defendant’s 1 to 2 on the day of the instant assault or spit, etc.

B. First, F is 3 to 4 times the Defendant.