(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.01.12 2016고정1138

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.01.12 2016고정1138

폭행등

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is an article that operates a village bus owned by the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and the defendant is a person who retires from D and works in the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Credit Resolution Co., Ltd.

A. A. The Defendant of assault around 10:15 on March 27, 2016, at around 10:15, the Defendant is living equally with the victim “on the front road of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H Apartment apartment 113.

The act of spiting and stopping the phrase “,” and spiting the victim’s face, spiting the victim who is seated in the village bus driver’s seat, with the victim’s vision, such as “the spiting fest flas......”

B. The Defendant damaged the said village bus by taking a bath and spiting spits as described in the foregoing paragraph (a), and then by taking the front part of the driving seat of the Do bus (E) driven by the victim on several occasions, such as cutting off the front part of the driving seat of the Do bus (E), which is driven by the victim, on several occasions, and cutting off the glass of driving seat with drinking seat.

2. Determination

A. First, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by this Court as to the crime of assault, the Defendant committed an assault against the victim solely based on the evidence submitted by the prosecutor.

The recognition is insufficient, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

1) On March 28, 2016, the victim made a written statement that the Defendant spits or spits the rocks with driving seat windows, and on the same day, the investigative agency made a statement that the Defendant spits or spits his windows in the windows so as to make the Defendant prepare for spits or spits his or her windows.

2) The Defendant made a statement at an investigative agency to the effect that spits or spits the victim’s right towards the victim, but the victim spits on the window by closing the windows, and made a statement to the same effect in this court.

3) In light of the above statements, the Defendant at the time when the Defendant spits spits.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2021.04.21 2020고정1408

-부산지방법원 2014.07.25 2012고합1043

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.03.18 2014고단1619

-서울남부지방법원 2014.07.25 2014노577

-광주지방법원 2013.12.26 2013고정119