1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. The Suwon District Court in respect of each land listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 through 16

1. Indication of claim;

A. The Plaintiff completed the provisional disposition registration of prohibition of disposal of real estate (hereinafter “the provisional disposition registration of this case”) as to each land listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each land of this case”) according to the Seoul District Court’s order of provisional disposition No. 97Kahap2831 (hereinafter “the provisional disposition order of this case”) as to each land listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each land of this case”).

B. On June 10, 2013, Nonparty B withdrawn the application for provisional disposition of this case with respect to each of the lands listed in the separate list Nos. 1 through 16 as the representative director of the Plaintiff. Accordingly, upon the request of the executing court, Nonparty B revoked the registration of provisional disposition of this case with respect to each of the above lands as the receipt on June 20, 2013 by the request of the executing court.

C. In addition, Nonparty C filed an application with the Plaintiff for revocation of the instant provisional disposition order on the land listed in the [Attachment 17] No. 2012Kahap1502 with the Seoul Western District Court.

On December 31, 2012, the above court accepted the above provisional disposition decision and revoked the above provisional disposition decision (hereinafter referred to as the "decision of revocation of provisional disposition of this case"). Accordingly, on February 7, 2013, the registration of provisional disposition of this case with respect to the above land was revoked by the request of the court of execution.

After that, the defendant completed the provisional disposition registration of the prohibition of real estate disposal as of May 15, 2014 with respect to each of the land of this case by the Suwon District Court, the receipt of May 15, 2014.

E. D and E, the Plaintiff’s shareholder, filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff seeking confirmation of invalidity of the resolution of the general meeting of shareholders as the U.S. District Court 2012Ga5756. On February 7, 2014, the said court rendered a judgment accepting the claim of D, etc. on the ground that “B, who appointed B as the representative director, was a resolution by the non-voting party, and there is no significant defect in the convocation procedure or method of resolution.”

As to this, the Plaintiff.