1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 8,871,798 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and its amount from April 11, 2017 to July 12, 2017.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall also be deemed to have been filed.

Basic Facts

On June 12, 2015, around 22:10, when E (the plaintiff's children, who was the plaintiff in 2004) had a stable in the D Park near Gangnam-gu Seoul apartment (the plaintiff's children, who was the plaintiff in 2004) caused an accident that the defendant suffered from his wife and transferred to the hospital through the 119 emergency squad (hereinafter referred to as "the accident in this case").

On April 27, 2015, the Defendant received a sex surgery at the end of the CoCo, and the instant accident caused a scrypted phenomenon (in particular, a scrypted phenomenon) in which the cocons were modified, so it was necessary to undergo a sex re-maltion. The Defendant was urged to undergo a sex re-mal surgery on June 27, 2016, when at least six months have elapsed after the award, i.e., when the scrying process was clearly revealed.

The Defendant spent 5,531,140 won (i.e., KRW 290,960, KRW 5,220,000) in total, including KRW 290,960, and medicine expenses, KRW 20,180, and KRW 5,220,00 in co-building operation expenses, on the day of the instant accident (i.e., KRW 290,960, KRW 5,220,00).

[Reasons for Recognition] Where there is no dispute, the entry of Eul Nos. 1 through 10, and the purport of the whole pleading is determined by the court below, and where a minor under the responsibility of the plaintiff to compensate for damages incurred to another person, a person under the legal obligation to supervise the minor shall be liable for compensation for

(Article 755(1) of the Civil Act. At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff, a person with parental authority, is liable for all damages suffered by the Defendant due to the instant accident caused by the negligence of the Plaintiff, as a minor who is merely a minor of the age of 11 and has no intelligence to change his responsibility for such act.

According to the evidence revealed earlier, the Defendant suffered injury, such as influence of external wounds, as he/she was in a state of crypology surgery one-month prior to the occurrence of the instant accident, as he/she was in a state of crypology surgery.