1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. Of the appeal costs, the part relating to the Plaintiff’s appeal is the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Status 1) The defendant is the defendant at Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dsung Hospital (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant Hospital").

2) On May 17, 2017, the Plaintiff is a patient with sexual surgery for cosmetic purposes at the Defendant Hospital.

B. On May 9, 2017, the Plaintiff, who was dissatisfied with the instant operation, was present at the Defendant Hospital, consulted first with the assistant nurse C, who is the head of the counseling office, and consulted again with the Defendant. On May 17, 2017, the Plaintiff, at the Defendant Hospital, determined that the Plaintiff was in a lump sum upon the Defendant’s recommendation, as well as the operation to correct eye and chrosium. 2) On May 17, 2017, the Plaintiff received from the Defendant Hospital: (a) rhythy operation, rhythy operation, rhythy operation, rhythy operation, rhythym operation, rhythym operation, rhythym operation, rhumthythy operation, rhumthing operation, and rhumthic injection operation, and (b) rumthic injection injection.

3) On the day of the surgery, the Plaintiff paid the operating expenses of KRW 2.5 million, 2.4 million, and 1.5 million, in total, KRW 6.4 million. (c) After the surgery, the Plaintiff returned home to the Defendant hospital on the day of the instant surgery, provided only explanation to the effect that the Plaintiff, who returned home to the Defendant hospital on the day of the surgery, was frightencing, and that the snow and chin were frighted, and that, if waiting from C, would be fine, he would be punished.

2) On May 20, 2017, when serious pains were continued on the operation department, the Plaintiff complained of the pains to the Defendant hospital, and on May 20, 2017, the Defendant complained of the pains to the Plaintiff’s operation department. The Plaintiff demanded to take CT shooting to the effect that the chrosium was unsatched, but the Defendant was well in operation, and CT shooting was deemed to have been carried out later. 3) On May 24, 2017, the Plaintiff re-entered to the Defendant hospital to remove the boomed boomed to the operation department.

At this time, the plaintiff is suffering from the defendant as to whether the defendant is with severe pain and sliffing the sliffy, or siffing the siffy.