logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.04.02 2013가단36120
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 31, 2008, the Plaintiff received a cosexual surgery at the Csung surgery operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) in order to add the type of solid container on the part of the Defendant, etc. subject to a musta, etc., and the nose at the end of the nose by inserting the scenture, scentle, and shotum on the part of the nose.

(hereinafter referred to as “first operation”). (b)

Then, on April 30, 2009, the Defendant: (a) met the Defendant hospital on the ground that the height of the cirth was lowered; (b) performed an operation to raise the cirth by adding the cirth to the cirth of May 8, 2009 (hereinafter “second operation”); (c) contacted the Plaintiff that the cirth of the cirth of August 14, 2009, the cirth of the cirth of the cirth of the cirst of the cirst of the cirst of February 12, 2010; and (d) performed an operation to transplant and inserting the cirth of the cirst of the Plaintiff’s cirst of the cirst

hereinafter referred to as "third operation".

(c) On or around December 7, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) discovered the Defendant; (b) resisted the fact that the height of the end of the third time after the third operation; and (c) was reduced; and (c) was performed with respect to the e-type surgery from the E-type department located in Seo-gu in Gwangju, Seo-gu on March 19, 2013, using the replacement of real containers and the e-mail; and (c) received the e-type surgery from the e-type department in Seo-gu, Gwangju; (b) (c) without any dispute over the grounds for recognition; (c) the statement and image of evidence No. 1-2, No. 1-2, and No. 2-1 through No. 4; and (c) the fact-finding results

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff's argument is due to the following negligence on the part of the defendant in relation to the first or third surgery performed by the defendant. The defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 3,2170,000 won [=3,00,000 won in the first operation expenses: KRW 7,170,000 in the second operation expenses: KRW 5,000 in the third operation expenses of KRW 3,570,000 in the third operation expenses of KRW 1,80,000 in the first operation expenses and KRW 4,570 in the operating expenses) and damages for delay.

1 The side effects which lower the end of the operation after all three times of the defendant's three operations.

arrow