The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal ① The Defendant asserted with the victim at the time of the instant case, while putting the victim’s bath and breath, did not support the victim’s chest due to the victim’s scam and head scam, but ② the victim scam beyond June 21, 201 and was treated by the hospital because the victim scams around the left side, and scam was treated by the hospital. As such, the Defendant was not suffered from the 4 weeks cam of the Defendant’s hair on the day of the instant case, the lower court convicted the Defendant of the charge of this case that the Defendant scam was cambling the victim’s chest on the part of the victim. The lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the evidence duly examined and adopted by the court below, and the following circumstances that can be recognized as see the statement in the court of the trial of the witness D and the statement in the opinion of the doctor E., i.e., from the police to the court of the court below and the court of the trial, the victim stated to the effect that "the defendant was at the time of the case at the time of the case at the time of the defendant's scambling and head with the scambling of the victim, and the scambling part of the victim's chest was cut off with the chest part of the victim's chest at the time of the case at the time of the case at the time of the police," and the defendant also stated to the police that "the victim's chest part of the victim's chest was scambling with the victim's chest part at the time of the case at the time of the case at the time of the case at the time of the victim at the time of the case at the time of the case at the victim, the victim was 20.