The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The summary of the facts charged was around February 28, 2012 at the house of the victim D(55 years) of Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, 2012, 402 (55 years and 402 years old). While talking about the repayment of debt, the victim’s husband E and her husband E were to fighting with the victim, and the victim was walking the victim’s chest on the ground that the victim said her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

2. The judgment contains a witness D and E’s legal statement, a police statement of D’s police statement, D’s accusation statement, and a victim’s injury diagnosis statement as evidence showing that the Defendant gave back the victim’s chest.

On the other hand, the defendant denies that he does not consent to D.

The statement of E is difficult to believe that the defendant did not explain D properly, because he did not explain D.

In addition, the above statements and evidence of D did not make a statement about the case of mutual assault between the defendant and E, the police dispatched at the time when D and E were exposed to the defendant's appearance, while they made a statement about the case of assault between the defendant and E, although they did not make a statement about D's damage even though they were investigated as the case of assault between the defendant and the defendant (it cannot be recognized according to the records of this case, although they asserted that D and E were the victim of damage), although they suffered from the injury to the extent that it would be cut back back, it is difficult to believe that it is also difficult to do so, in light of the fact that D and E was first diagnosed on March 2, 2012 after the date of this case.

Finally, in light of the above circumstances, it is not enough to recognize the above facts charged in view of the fact that D had been treated as a cage cage cages.

In the end, it is eventually.