A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the actual operator of the Dju's store in the public city C, and E is a de facto spouse of the defendant, who is in charge of the above Dju's business.

On March 24, 2015, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol and telephone conversations around 19:00, was refused to talk E with the words “drawing so as to drink” while drinking.

At around 21:40 on the same day, the Defendant called “Isker waer and sker waer, etc. to present waer,” and called “Isker waer, etc. to present waer.” However, the Defendant heard the said horse and got off the door of the said ringer, and did not receive telephone contact after the ringer, etc., and the Defendant was able to extinguish the said ringer by putting the strings, etc., such as the tablers on the said ringer, etc., and setting fire to the said ringer.

Therefore, at around 23:10 on the same day, the Defendant attempted to extinguish the instant main point by using a stringer located therein, with a spores, with a spores, with a spores, and with a spores, but spores, the Defendant attempted to extinguish the spores, and attempted to stop the spores, with a spores, and to stop the spores, with a spores, and to stop

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. 112 Reporting case management marks and field photographs;

1. Application of investigation reports (verification of damage amount caused by destruction of property), investigation reports (to hear statements from the victim E-mail) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 174 and 166 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following consideration shall be made again for the reason of sentencing);

1. Determination on the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion regarding orders to provide community service and attend lectures

1. The Defendant, at the time of determining the assertion that there was no intention to prevent a structure, had the fact of attaching a tree salt to the wooden sled, but this is drunk.