beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff’s obligation stated in the attached list 1 against the Defendant does not exist beyond KRW 65,88,90.
Reasons
1. The Plaintiff and the Defendant, based on the facts, became aware of each other in the course of parcelling-out of D shopping districts listed in the attached Table 2 list in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, (the enforcement is in the Plaintiff’s name of wife E and wife H, a representative of F Co., Ltd.; hereinafter “instant shopping districts”). From August 30, 201 to January 25, 2013, the Defendant paid the Plaintiff a sum of KRW 1,728,318,000 as indicated in the following list:
<피고의 원고에 대한 지급내역> 순번 날짜 금액(단위 : 원) 비고 1 2011. 8. 30. 50,000,000 계좌이체 2 2011. 8. 30. 50,000,000 계좌이체 3 2011. 10. 17. 100,000,000 계좌이체 4 2011. 10. 17. 50,000,000 계좌이체 5 2011. 10. 19. 100,000,000 계좌이체 6 2011. 11. 14. 126,000,000 무통장입금 7 2011. 12. 19. 100,000,000 계좌이체 8 2011. 12. 19. 100,000,000 계좌이체 9 2011. 12. 19. 26,318,000 계좌이체 10 2012. 1. 13. 200,000,000 수표지급 11 2012. 1. 13. 100,000,000 수표지급 12 2012. 1. 17. 50,000,000 수표지급 13 2012. 9. 3. 5,000,000 현금지급 14 2012. 9. 3. 1,000,000 수표지급 15 2012. 9. 3. 1,000,000 수표지급 16 2012. 9. 3. 1,000,000 수표지급 17 2012. 9. 3. 1,000,000 수표지급 18 2012. 9. 3. 1,000,000 수표지급 19 2012. 9. 7. 1,000,000 수표지급 20 2012. 10. 24. 150,000,000 무통장입금 21 2012. 12. 12. 150,000,000 무통장입금 22 2013. 1. 17. 150,000,000 무통장입금 23 2013. 1. 18. 10,000,000 계좌이체 24 2013. 1. 18. 150,000,000 계좌이체 원고의 요청으로 I에게 송금 25 2013. 1. 25. 10,000,000 계좌이체 26 2013. 1. 25. 10,000,000 계좌이체 27 2013. 1. 25. 10,000,000 계좌이체 28 2013. 1. 25. 25,000,000 계좌이체 합계 1,728,318,000 [인정 근거] 다툼 없는 사실, 을 제2호증의 1, 2, 을 제3 내지 8호증(을 제2, 7호증의 경우 각 가지번호 포함), 을 제10, 11, 16, 20호증의 각 기재, 변론 전체의 취지
2. The defendant's return of unjust enrichment or claim for damages against the plaintiff;
A. The plaintiff is the defendant 106, 106, 100.